9/11: Eleven Years Into the Nightmare
Well, it’s the eleventh anniversary of the disaster that has befallen the United States, and indeed the world. Having spent a few days in North Central Europe has shown me has far the U.S. has fallen.
There is no question that Americans are continuing to lose their basic rights, and all for what? Even IF one choses to believe the U.S. government’s official story of 9/11 (which I will never do), the creation of such a sprawling Homeland Security/National Security State can never be justified. To say nothing of the spending of billions upon billions of dollars to create drones that kill innocent people around the world.
What has happened to the country I was born and raised in? What has happened to America? She has been hijacked by the most evil, rapacious, hell-bound cabal in our world. That’s what has happened to her. No matter how dark our times get, we must never give up trying to save her.








I agree with you completely Rich. When we were in grade school outside of DC we would walk ourselves the mile to school even as young as 6 or 7 years old and no one thought twice about our safety. It’s disgraceful what the government and mass media are perpetrating. They make it out to be a million times worse than it really is out there. I don’t trust anything even the latest Batman shootings. The more I see the less trust I have in our government. The Internet is waking everyone up including those in the Military. It has to stop because we are more enlightened than the German people were when Hitler was playing the same cards in Germany.
Big Money in government is the main problem. Strictly from a strategic standpoint, only the Democratic Party opposes Citizen’s United” and other laws the sell our country to the highest bidder. Frankly, a lot of these people don’t like Obama because he’s a black man. If you look above the whole damn political disaster of a locked up Congress we have, above watching Republicans settle for Mitt and Lie-en Ryan… thing, you see the Puppet Masters pulling the strings. This wouldn’t happen if politicians were vetted more rigorously. Big government or smart government is a redundant question. Don’t be distracted from what is happening above the fray. We have to stop allowing the United States to be sold to the highest bidder.
Hi Richard, your comments are very succinct and on point. I travelled to NYC with my family in early August. It was more their idea than mine, having been there now I don’t regret it a bit and may return some day. I see from facebook that you and your family were there around the same time. We visited the memorial and saw some other sites. My layman’s opinion after seeing the new construction and surveying the area is that there is no way two planes could have caused the events that subsequently transpired in the manner in which they did. When one sees the example of the B-17 flying into the Empire State Building (also visited that) and the Malaysian steel structure highrise that burned for over 20 hours and did not collapse (and apparently no steel structure ever has collapsed from fire) the entire official version of WTC, the Pentagon, Building 7, on and on, is hard to believe. On a side note, I met a gentleman who may have worked with your father at the WTC, he told me he was in the first tower when it was hit and that he ran security. He said he walked out of the first tower after the impact in time to see the second plane hit. Unfortunately I did not have the opportunity, as it would not have been appropriate, to start to question him in detail, FYI, I asked if he knows your father and he said he knows lots of people named Dolan. Maybe you know who he is
Actually, in my previous post I was thinking about the Windsor Tower in Madrid as my primary example as one that burned for over 20 hours without collapsing
Oh my! 10 years after 9/11, and I finally get to watch and litesn to what the kids were actually saying. Now I understand why Michael Moore did not include any audio when he showed this clip in Fahrenheit 9/11. The words these kids were saying are unsettling. These children should be 16-18 years old now. It would be interesting to hear what they have to say about it all.
NORAD and 911
Within mere minutes of my being informed of the impact of Flight 11 into the North WTC tower — that is to say well prior to the intrusion of a second airliner into lower Manhattan airspace — I knew that the Pentagon was intimately and inextricably interwoven into the emerging tapestry of terror. And how did I know? In part, because as a youngster, by the luck of the draw as it were, I resided for 10 years on a military base wherein an important component of NORAD is headquartered. That experience, when combined with my subsequent 13 years involvement in the aerospace industry as a vendor of air traffic control avionics, permits me to address with authority that particular aspect of the days’ events.
It should be remembered that all of the flights allegedly highjacked on Sept. 11 were routine commercial flights, and as such were required, pursuant to FAA protocols, to submit flight plans to that agency in advance; the data contained within these plans includes, inter alia, average airspeed, assigned altitude, route coordinates, and ETA. The FAA, in its turn, shares all flight plans with NORAD, again as per requirement.
Even momentary deviations from any of the aforementioned criteria are detected in real time by the FAA’s and NORAD’s terrestrial antenna arrays and by space-based communication, imaging, eavesdropping, and GPS platforms maintained by the Air Force, and the NRO, and the NGIA, and the NSA, Any sustained anomalies will set off alarm bells even if, especially if, a given aircraft were suddenly to observe RF silence, i.e., were it to disable its transponder. Otherwise the USAF, tasked with securing American airspace, would find itself unable to distinguish its friends — or to extinguish its foes — were the continental US to be suddenly subjected to aerial attack! The catchphrase for this omnivorous capability back in the day was “universal air surveillance.”
(Universal air surveillance, as defined to me by more than one participating scientist, on more than one occasion some four-plus decades ago meant that the velocity and trajectory of any aerial vehicle, aloft at altitudes ranging from a few hundred feet above sea level to several hundred miles above planet Earth itself was subjected to real-time, 24/7 scrutiny! So acute was the network’s sensitivity, even items as miniscule as the dislodged nuts, bolts, wires, and washers that comprised the flotsam and jetsam of American and Russian endeavors in outer space were precisely pinpointed at all times. The system, as configured in the mid-1960s, could track hundreds of air/spacecraft simultaneously and was, by virtue of its redundancy, considered to be fail-safe. This formidable achievement, attained as it was years before the NSA’s fishnet of spy satellites was established, and decades prior to the deployment of DoD’s GPS array was, not unjustifiably, a point of pride to both its designers and its overseers.)
Bottom line? At no point were the whereabouts of any of the four errant aircraft left to chance and thus the failure to interdict these flights could only have occurred pursuant to orders.
I well remember laughing to myself when, in the aftermath of the tragedy, a mainstream media organ was queried as to why the wildly deviant flight path of one or another of the doomed planes had proceeded apace — without detection, without interception. The news organ in question, forwarded that query to a gentleman it deemed certified to expostulate on such matters. The Expert replied that the aircraft tracking antenna (as though there was only one tasked with the tracking of the plane in question) was at that auspicious moment unable to detect the deviation because it had — Are you ready for this? — been “facing the wrong way!”
Say what?!
What his response implied, but dared not state, was that the lone antenna, though fully functional, maintained a fixed position 180 degrees opposite to that of the aircraft its was assigned to track and, for that reason, had been derelict in its duties. Of course, as anyone who has ever passed by a large airport has doubtlessly observed, air traffic control antennas are in a state of constant rotation, because the accurate management of air traffic requires the precise positioning of all aircraft in its vicinity at all times, a degree of accuracy, only the ongoing triangulation capability afforded by a rotating antenna can provide. Oh well, at least our Expert didn’t claim that a non-functional transponder was the culprit!
For a “real world” example of the tracking matrix at work, one need only to revisit the sad saga of PGA icon Payne Stuart. When the golfer’s Learjet lost cabin air pressure somewhere over the middle west and subsequently veered off piste, that deviation was quickly detected and his aircraft accurately located, promptly interdicted, and subsequently shepherded by a brace of F-16s. The fighter pilots were prepared to incinerate the zombie aerodyne were it to assume a downward trajectory that would culminate with its impact into a populated area once its fuel reserve had been exhausted. Suffice it to say that NORAD’s minions weren’t asleep at their CRTs that day!
An Ominous Postscript
On the evening of September 14th, I was visiting a relative in Northern Virginia. Naturally, the events of three days earlier were the cynosure of conversation. A neighbor who was present throughout the discussion the let it be known that his closest friend worked at the Pentagon, his employer of record being the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI). He further elaborated that on the evening of the 11th his friend, rendered distraught by the tragedy, informed him that during the previous afternoon, his supervisor had taken him aside and suggested that he spend the next day with his family as it would be a “slow day at the office.” The underling, knowing that his wife couldn’t request a day off on such short notice, politely declined the offer. Almost instantly, his superior’s demeanor underwent a Jekyll-to-Hyde transmutation — his posture stiffened, his gaze intensified, and his voice acquired a stern sonority — at which point he was then ordered not to attend work on the following day! The junior employee complied, no questions asked and, come the morning, joined the millions of Americans glued to their televisions, transfixed by the unfolding events; the awkward exchange of the previous afternoon was forgotten, if but briefly. Moments later, it was reported that a third wayward plane had impacted the Pentagon, and that the collision point had occurred precisely where his office had been located!
Are we to suppose that the ONI official was only coincidentally clairvoyant?
(I learned subsequently, that the area impacted by the plane had very recently undergone extensive structural reinforcement. Why would a low-rise building, and one none the worse for wear to boot, require beefing up?)
People would be more willing and less fearful of adopting the views of 911 Truth activists if they felt they were calling for forgiveness rather than retribution and punishment.
The peace movement should call for granting amnesty from prosecution and guarantee of an ample, lifetime pension to anyone who agrees to testify on their roles in the events of 9/11, extending this offer to any members of the US government, foreign governments and/or terrorist groups involved in the planning or execution of the attacks of that day.
Additionally, individuals should step forward and volunteer to spend time working with those who give testimony on crimes they have committed so that they might be reintegrated into society.
Instead of executing Nazi war criminals we should have devoted all the human resources available to us to rehabilitating them, awakening in them awareness of the nature of their actions so that they could have come to understand that they must make amends. If they had remained alive they would have been a living testament to the transformative powers of forgiveness.
Historians and psychologists especially should come out in favor of preserving invaluable study material in the form of the opportunity to converse with the authors of unfortunate historical deeds.
We must find a solution to the existing state of affairs that would be acceptable to both the accusers and the accused. It should solve the problem it sets out to solve without creating additional problems. It should present itself as an ethical means to an ethical end.
In “The Art of War”, Sun Tzu said never to surround an enemy. If you do not leave him an out, he will fight to the last man.
For an interesting discussion of these ideas please see (and expand the comments) three posts by “John Stan” here:
http://www.opednews.com/a/33744?show=votes#allcomments
“In “The Art of War”, Sun Tzu said never to surround an enemy. If you do not leave him an out, he will fight to the last man.”
(?)
This applies to a time when some equivalence between opponents was possible. Now there is none. Those in charge have the capacity with a few representative numbers compared to the majority of humanity to kill at will, when ever they choose, individually, in small numbers or in massive numbers.
Yo, that’s what’s up truhtflluy.
John
In an ideal world, it would be a pinnacle of human civility to be able to believe every criminal is capable of being rehabilitated. But some crimes are too brutal, inflict too much widespread physical and mental damage that the perpetrators should not be allowed the luxury of life – mainly because some people are simply too dangerous to risk being set free again. Taking your Nazi example – would you authorise Hitler’s parole? (I think Sun Tsu was saying ‘let a defeated enemy retreat’). The people behind 9/11 are still on the offensive and do not deserve leniency. They offered no mercy in Iraq or any other “countries of concern”.
The pet goat is a story of an unwanted goat, the goat then stays when he beeomcs a hero I don’t believe in religion but if some of you think Bush sacrificed a goat for Satan in front of the kids as they read the book then I need prescription glasses. Didn’t Abraham sacrifice goats to God? I’m sorry, that’s not the same is it? He was actually going to sacrifice his own son, that’s how it’s different. Got it
“Taking our Nazi example”
http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/511928.html
So what happened to the people of Flight 93 – the one that didn’t really crash into the field with people talking to their loved ones on the way down. Did they all get taken away and shot by covert US government operatives?
And what about the people on the plane that apparently didn’t crash into the Pentagon because in fact it was a Cruise missile – did they all get shot as well.
C’mon conspiracy people – just listen to yourselves. Its madness. Stick to the facts.
Stick with an area like UFO research were numerous credible people report consistently on strange phenomena in the sky – and try understand the difference between evidence and speculation based on bizarre circumstantial connections.